The left has never acknowledged the importance of the Electoral College. Vice Presidential nominee Tim Walz proposes abolishing the Electoral College. Mark Levin warns that is the worst-case scenario. The college represents all of the states, rather than a few that wield power over the rest of the country.
The Drive to Eliminate the Electoral College
Tim Walz has come out in support of abolishing the Electoral College in order to transform the presidential election process. Mark Levin critically examines this initiative, highlighting potential risks such as the dominance of a few populous states in determining presidential outcomes. According to Levin, such a change would effectively marginalize the majority of states’ political voices, tipping the balance in favor of heavily Democratic regions.
The consequences could be significant. Campaigning may become city-centric, overlooking rural interests, particularly those concerning agriculture and resource management. Levin also warns that eliminating the filibuster may result in unbridled legislative power following such reforms.
Tim Walz says the Electoral College ‘needs to go.’ Mark Levin explains what that would look like https://t.co/I3r5yPYsMV pic.twitter.com/sFzKupnizb
— TheBlaze (@theblaze) October 30, 2024
Strategic Moves Toward Democratic Dominance
Walz’s proposal is consistent with broader Democratic strategies that Levin believes aim to consolidate power. This includes the possibility of Washington, D.C. and Puerto Rico gaining statehood, which would bring more Democratic Senators into Congress.
Levin contends that by avoiding constitutional amendment routes, the Democratic Party could establish a long-term Senate majority, fundamentally altering the political landscape.
Furthermore, such changes could stymie Republican efforts to retake Senate control, cementing one-party dominance with few checks and balances. Levin describes a future Harris-Walz administration under these circumstances as transformative, with long-term consequences for electoral systems and governance.
It's critical Americans understand WHY we MUST keep the electoral college. For one, we don't want mob rule. Another, small states would be forever ignored. We are a Constitutional Republic, not a democracy.https://t.co/prmvRPepoV
— Benji Franklin (@Gazette2023) October 31, 2024
Legislative Context and Concerns
The recently enacted Electoral Count Reform Act of 2022 seeks to resolve ambiguities left over from the contested 2020 election. It establishes clear guidelines for resolving elector disputes and affirms the Senate President’s ministerial role in certifying votes. Levin, on the other hand, emphasizes the potential challenges at the state level, where this legislation may conflict with local election practices.
Legal frameworks are evolving to protect against election disputes; however, the risk of political, legislative, and judicial challenges remains. As political tensions rise, the discussion surrounding these reforms highlights a critical debate over national democracy and electoral equity.
As debates heat up, it is critical that American citizens remain vigilant, critical, and informed about the potential consequences of electoral reforms.
